Although a market that favors consolidation may
cause the number of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans to dwindle from
today's high of 47 down to 20 or 25 over the next five years, consumers
shouldn't be alarmed, according to a Conning & Co. study.
|
The Blues overall generated a "paltry" 0.8 percent profit margin in
1999, compared to the 2.5 percent profit margin of the Blues that were
publicly traded. |
The
study, published March 13, 2001, reports that many of the Blue Cross
and Blue Shield plans, known as the Blues, lack adequate access to
capital to compete with their bigger non-Blue rivals. These mostly
nonprofit Blues will be forced to merge with other Blues plans or
become publicly traded stock companies to even the market's playing
field that currently favors large for-profit insurers.
For
example, the for-profit Anthem has merged with Blue Cross and Blue
Shield HMOs in Connecticut, Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio, and is
currently exploring conversion from a mutual insurance company to a publicly traded stock company.
"There
will likely be a knee-jerk reaction that the Blues are selling out to
become for-profit entities, especially since they've historically been
nonprofits," says Conning Vice President Samuel Levitt, the study's
author. "But the economic realities of health care leave them no
choice. Having a competitive market is good for the consumer in the
long run." "Though this trusted brand attracts consumers who are
uneasy with managed care, increasing enrollments appear to have not
been enough to offset the meager profit margins among the Blues
overall," Levitt says. "To remain competitive, the Blues will need to
restructure and consolidate and many will test the public markets." The
result, says Levitt, will likely bode well for consumers if these moves
improve the Blues' overall financial strength. But consumer advocacy groups warn that studies like these
are self-serving to the insurance industry and that the consolidation
trend will ultimately spell disaster for consumers. "Studies like these
drive the parade [of consumers] to the wolf," says Jamie Court, a
spokesperson with the Foundation of Taxpayer & Consumer Rights.
"All the pernicious problems of managed care can be traced back to
health insurers becoming for-profits. Nonprofits can compete if they
don't join the race for the bottom with the for-profits that slash
costs and don't maintain quality. Consumers will pay more for a
higher-quality product."
The
study concludes that meager profits have created a "vicious cycle" that
will be increasingly difficult for the Blues to overcome. According to
Levitt, low profit margins:
- Make it more costly for the Blues to obtain the new capital they need to plow back into their businesses.
- Are further reduced because a lion's share of any surplus is held back to satisfy the insurance industry's reserve requirements.
- Make
it difficult to compete with companies with larger profit margins
because these companies have used their advantage to obtain capital to
invest heavily in targeted acquisitions, product development, and new
technologies to improve efficiency and customer service. "In today's
market, scale and efficiency matter," Levitt says.
Conning & Co. located in Hartford, Conn., is a subsidiary of
Conning Corp., which provides asset management services and research to
insurance companies.
|