“Isn’t that sad for
America’s children?” asked U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on October
14, 2007. The legislator was appearing on ABC’s “This Week” to
discuss new health insurance legislation that President George Bush had just vetoed.
The
bill would have increased coverage under the Children’s Health
Insurance Program by an estimated 3.4 million children to a total of
approximately 10 million children covered. Funding for the
measures was included in the proposed legislation in the form of a 61 ease in the Federal cigarette tax to $1 per pack.
Many
Democrats and a few Republicans touted the bill as a bipartisan,
bicameral compromise. In a preliminary press release, Democrats
Pelosi, Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Charles Rangel
(D-N.Y.), John Dingell (D-Mich), Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.) and Frank
Pallone (D-N.J.) all endorsed the bill, and were joined by prominent
Republican senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa)
and Rep. Ray LaHood (R-Ill).
The
bill passed both House and Senate despite President Bush’s warning of a
veto. True to his word, he slapped the veto on the bill on
October 10, only the fourth veto of his Presidential career.
In
the President’s opinion, which he announced before the vote and
reiterated multiple times, a $35 billion increase on Federal funding of
health care was far too much. Bush had recommended a $5 billion
increase to Congress, hoping to limit the spending and balance a
teetering budget.
Bush also criticized the idea of funding health care for citizens who could in fact afford private health insurance.
He also, in true conservative fashion, declared that better care would
be available more quickly, efficiently and cheaply if provided
privately.
The program expansion was designed as an
insurance bridge to span the gap between those eligible for Medicaid
and those who could afford private insurance. According to the
Democrats (as well as the Republicans who supported the measure),
government funded health insurance is necessary for those who fall
below the 250% poverty line, which usually amounts to a family income
just over $50,000. Critics of the plan of course call such
extensive aid ridiculous.
After Bush vetoed the bill,
Pelosi and other Democratic leaders began campaigning for a
Congressional override, and secured the necessary votes in the
Senate. But similar efforts in the House soon stalled, and the
matter appears to be resolved for the time being.
Meanwhile,
of course, there are the requisite politics being played.
Appearing on the same show as Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell characterized the situation as a game of leverage, saying,
“Neither side is going to leave these kids uninsured…. The coverage is
going to be provided in some way.”
The
debate bears interesting angles on the Presidential election next year,
as the candidates almost split neatly along party lines. The
notable exception was Dennis Kucinich, who voted against the measure in
the House, and then voted to override the Presidential veto because he
claimed it was important to hold Bush “accountable.”
So for
now, Republican candidates Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson and John McCain
are the winners insofar as the bill failed to become law.
However, some analysts predict that the Democrats will claim a moral
upper hand come next fall as the supporters of expanded children’s
health programs, and therefore of children. But that’s a question
only time will answer.
|