| Marketing and research spending of nine U.S. drug companies |
Company
|
Percent of
revenues
spent on
marketing
(2001) |
Percent of revenues
spent on research
(2001) |
| Abbott Laboratories
|
23 percent |
10 percent |
| Allergan
|
42 percent |
15 percent |
| Bristol-
Myers Squibb
|
27 percent |
12 percent |
| Eli Lilly
|
30 percent |
19 percent |
| Merck
|
13 percent |
5 percent |
| Pfizer
|
35 percent |
15 percent |
| Pharmacia
|
44 percent |
16 percent |
| Schering-Plough
|
36 percent |
13 percent |
| Wyeth
|
37 percent |
13 percent |
U.S. drug companies that market the 50 most-often prescribed drugs to seniors spent more than twice as much on advertising, marketing, and administration in 2001 as they spent on research and development, according to a report by Families USA, a nonprofit national health care organization.
Saying the report "debunks President Bush's recent assertion, and the drug companies' claims that high and fast-rising drug prices are needed to support R&D," the Families USA report shows that nine U.S. pharmaceutical companies spent a total of $45.4 billion on marketing and administration in 2001, while they spent only $19.1 billion on the research and development of new drugs. The report also says that the companies generated a total of $30.6 billion in profits in 2001, more than 60 percent higher than their research expenditures.
Families USA's figures are incorrect because it lumps administrative costs in with advertising, according to the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).
"Last year, PhRMA member companies spent $30.3 billion on new drug research and development," says PhRMA. "In contrast, the industry spent about $9 billion on promotion to consumers and doctors and about $10 billion on free drug samples. When Families USA attacks our promotional spending, they are really attacking the $10 billion in free drug samples that we give away each year to doctors who often use these free medicines to help needy patients. Thats not very family-friendly."
|