Is it ever a good idea to sign your life insurance policy over to a charity? Depends on your motives. Depends on the policy. Depends on the charity.
While
many people donate entirely for altruistic reasons, it is true that
charitable donations are tax deductible. If that's one of your motives
for signing away the benefits of your life insurance policy, you should
first confirm a few things.
| In order to take a deduction, you will have to make the charity both the owner and the beneficiary of your policy. |
First
of all, ascertain that the organization actually has nonprofit status —
that it's a 501(c)(3) organization. Then talk to someone at the
organization to make sure it will accept your life insurance policy
proceeds as a gift (some charities find they're more trouble than
they're worth).
In order to take a deduction, you will
have to make the charity both the owner (in states where allowed) and
the beneficiary of your policy. If you name the charity as your
policy's beneficiary but not the owner, then the IRS won't let you deduct the donation of your life insurance proceeds from your taxes.
Do you donate a term or whole life policy? Term life insurance policies
cost the least, but they're also the least attractive to charities.
Once the term expires on that policy, it's worthless. Whole life
policies cost more, but they have a cash value that builds up the
longer you pay premiums on them. Thus, a whole life policy has some
intrinsic value to it, although cash surrender value is usually far
less than the death benefit amount.
If you donate a term
life policy to a charity, you can deduct the cost of the premiums from
your taxes. If you donate a whole life policy, you can deduct the cash
value of the policy as well as the cost of the subsequent premiums.
According to folks who work in university development offices, most
charities would rather be able to make use of a donation right away.
Assuming that your goal is to fund scholarships and educate, then a
life insurance policy is not going to immediately serve that purpose.
Larger
organizations, such as major universities, have their own teams of
money managers — people whose sole purpose is to make the school's
money grow. It may be that such an organization's endowment fund might
be better off investing the money you spend on premiums. Insurance
companies are in the business of making money. The money they earn from
these policies is money the charity could be using instead.
Here's
an example: One large school accepts — but immediately cancels and
cashes in — a whole life policy on a 41-year-old male donor. The policy
had a $350,000 death benefit and a $20,000 cash surrender value.
Assuming the insured lives 38 more years, that $20,000 must earn 7.8
percent a year to grow to match the death benefit value of $350,000.
But that same $20,000, invested in the stock market at an average
annual return of 10.43 percent annually (the average annual rate of
return of the Standard & Poor's 500 from January 1926 to December
2007), will grow to $867,638 over the same time period (minus capital
gains taxes).
By canceling the policy and keeping and
investing the cash value, the school will come out ahead. That analysis
also leaves out the immediate utility value to the school of having the
cash immediately. Of course, there is no guarantee that past
performance will be repeated in the future or that the funds so
invested will not decline as a result of poor investment performance.
So
it's clear that larger charities may believe they can put that money to
better use by investing it themselves. But smaller, local charities may
not have those resources. And those charities are more likely to
welcome any kind of contribution you offer. Still, it helps to remember
that the death benefit of a life insurance policy won't be available
until after you die, and most charities need the money now.
|