State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. saw
its net income drop nearly 60 percent in 2000, attributing the drastic
plunge to a larger-than-expected number of losses, auto insurance rate reductions in several states, and expenses involved in starting up new operations.
The
Bloomington, Ill., insurer reported net income of $408.1 million in
2000, down $626 million from $1.03 billion in 1999. State Farm's total
net worth decreased by $2.1 billion last year, going from $45.8 billion
to $43.7 billion.
Dick Luedke, a spokesperson for State
Farm, attributed the plunge to a variety of factors. He says that while
the United States didn't suffer any major catastrophes in 2000,
catastrophe losses were up 15 percent — from $1.43 billion in 1999 to
$1.64 billion in 2000 — due to "mid-level catastrophes" that did not
receive much publicity, but caused millions of dollars in damage
nonetheless. Luedke noted there was a hailstorm in the Midwest in May
that caused $208 million in damage, placing it ninth on State Farm's
all time list of losses. "We really didn't anticipate the severity of
the claims that occurred," he says.
On the mend
State Farm has proposed rate changes in the following states so far in
2001. It expects to boost its bottom line by taking more rate increases
than decreases in 2001. |
| Arizona |
5.9 percent increase |
| Delaware |
3.5 percent decrease |
| Hawaii |
3.5 percent decrease |
| Michigan |
1.4 percent increase |
| Montana |
4.3 percent inrease |
| North Dakota |
0.5 percent decrease |
| Texas |
1.8 percent increase |
| Washington |
1 percent increase |
| Source: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. |
Luedke
also says that claim costs were rising, particularly in medical costs
and replacement auto parts. After being slapped with a $456 million
judgment in the fall of 1999 for breaching its contract with
policyholders over the use of non-Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)
parts, State Farm has suspended the use of those parts, which has
driven up claim costs. The insurer had other significant expenses, including the
rollout of the State Farm Bank and the introduction of its mutual
funds. The insurer also paid a record $1 billion dividend to
policyholders, and also took $672 million in state rate decreases
across the country. On a more positive note, Luedke says that State Farm grew
its total number of policies in force by 2.5 percent (from 67.5 million
in 1999 to 69.2 million in 2000), and 2.3 percent in auto policies
(from 37.1 million in 1999 to 37.9 million in 2000). Luedke says he does not foresee any changes in
underwriting guidelines, nor major expense cutting or job losses at
State Farm as a result of the poor earnings. He says that while the
insurer offered more state rate decreases than increases in 2000, he
expects a reverse trend in 2001. "We feel good about the business we're
writing," he says. "We're growing with more agents and more
policyholders."
The
problems State Farm faced were similar to those faced by other
property/casualty insurers last year, according to John Andre, vice
president of the property/casualty division at A.M. Best, an insurance
ratings and research company. The auto insurance market remains
competitive, which means insurers are trying to keep premiums down.
However, claim costs are rising, which means auto insurers are being
hard pressed to earn strong profits. Other than the culprits that Luedke described, Andre says
that the company's investment returns suffered a blow, particularly in
the fourth quarter, when the stock market took a beating. "Their
equities got caught up in a lot of paper losses," Andre says. Charles Titterton, a director in Standard & Poor's
insurance group, says that while State Farm plans to take rate
increases in a few states this year, it will not raise rates to the
point where it feels that it may drive away customers. "State Farm is
very concerned with persistency in policyholder renewal and retention
and culling good policyholders," he says. "State Farm has been
defending its market share. They're willing to incur operating results
that are pretty subpar over a fairly extended period of time to defend
that position." Andre says that State Farm's 2000 results should not be
particularly worrisome to the insurer because State Farm still has an
extremely strong surplus. As a mutual company, State Farm is not under
any stockholder pressure, so Andre says he does not expect any drastic
changes to cut costs. Still, Andre says he does not see trends in the auto
industry changing for the better, at least in the near future. "It's
not going to get any better," he says. "It may stay the same or get
worse."
|