The astronomic rise in
health care costs is forcing many hospitals to scrape for every penny.
As a result, some hospitals are laying claim to portions of consumers' auto insurance liability settlements in order to recoup payment for services rendered.
There's nothing wrong with collecting what's owed. When hospitals bill the health insurer or HMO and the consumer, that’s known as “balance billing.” Several courts have ruled the practice illegal.
Hospitals have every right to receive
payment for services rendered and can come after you if you or your
health insurer haven't paid your bills. In fact, some Medicare+Choice
plans allow doctors and hospitals to bill you over and above what
Medicare normally pays.
If your health
insurer and the health care providers agree on a payment schedule, even
if those fees are at a discount, the health care providers can't seek
reimbursement from you, once they've been paid by your health plan.
Some
hospitals are ignoring the law, when auto insurance liability
settlements are involved. Here's how a hospital might try to claim part
of your liability settlement.
Say
you were injured in an auto accident that was not your fault and were
admitted to the hospital because you sustained moderate injuries. You
tell the admissions personnel your injuries are the result of an auto
accident and you have health insurance. You belong to an HMO, which has
an agreement with that hospital to provide you with medical care at a
discount. Your HMO picks up the tab for you and the hospital is
supposed to consider payment from the HMO as full reimbursement.
The hospital, knowing you were injured in an auto accident, files a lien against any car insurance
liability settlement you collect — meaning the hospital gets to collect
the difference between what your HMO paid and what the medical care
actually cost. For instance, your hospital bill is $10,000 and your
HMO's preset agreement with the hospital allows it a discount of 40
percent. Your HMO pays $6,000 and, if you collect an insurance
settlement, the hospital will come after you for the remaining $4,000.
| There have
been court cases that ruled "balanced billing" is an illegal practice. |
Courts have ruled "balanced billing" is an illegal practice. In a Texas case (Satsky vs. United States of America),
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent ruled a hospital's attempt to recover
payment from former patient Linda Satsky was prohibited because
Satsky's health insurance company and the hospital had an agreement on
the charges for her care.
Satsky had
received a liability settlement as a result of an auto accident. The
hospital to which she was admitted filed a lien against any liability
settlement she received. Judge Kent ruled; however, that "a lien can
only legally attach if there is an underlying debt secured by the lien.
. . . The facts prove that Satsky's insurer has paid all of the sums
owed to the hospital. . . . As there is no debt, there can be no lien."
In Dorr vs. Sacred Heart Hospital,
a case decided by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, the court ruled a
hospital acted in bad faith by trying to collect payment from Beverly
Dorr for services rendered. The hospital had filed a lien against any
liability settlement Dorr received as a result of an auto accident.
The
court ruled Sacred Heart Hospital filed the lien "purely as a ploy to
try to get as much money as possible," and stated that there was "ample
evidence" to show the hospital intentionally disregarded Dorr's rights
to her full liability settlement by trying to collect on the lien.
In
addition to the case law, Maryland's attorney general and the insurance
commissioners in Arkansas and Florida have specifically warned
hospitals and other health care providers about the illegality of
"balance billing." The Maryland attorney general claims "no [health
care provider], whether under contract with the HMO or not, could
charge an HMO subscriber for any treatment which was a covered
service."
In Massachusetts, the state
insurance department banned “balance billing.” “This program has
certainly proven to be successful. Saving tens of millions of dollars
not only helps the state, but also keeps our members’ premiums down,”
says Shawn Duhamel, legislative liaison for the Retired State, County
and Municipal Employees Association of Massachusetts. “Hospitals and
doctors had long viewed [balance billing] as a blank check. That
practice had to end.”
When
you receive a liability settlement after an auto accident, you don't
have to give your health care providers a dime if your health insurance
company and the hospital or doctor have an agreement on how services
will be paid. You might have to hand over a portion of it to your HMO
or health insurer, if it paid for your medical treatment. Your health
insurance contract might say your health insurer has the right to
subrogate — meaning seek payment — if you receive a settlement.
“It’s
important for HMO members to know both their rights and their
responsibilities with respect to balance billing. Not knowing could
cost you hundreds, even thousands, of dollars or endanger your credit
rating,” warns Jose Montemayor, the insurance commissioner of Texas.